PATENT INFRINGEMENT

 

Since a patent gives its owner a monopoly on making, using, selling, or importing the invention, any unauthorized making, using, selling, or importing the invention is called infringement and the infringer can be sued by the patent owner for patent infringement. In such a lawsuit, a Court may order the infringer to stop the infringing activities and also award monetary damages to the patent owner against the infringer.

In a patent infringement lawsuit, the Court determines the scope of the claims in the patent, which means, in essence, how much and what is covered by the patent. After the scope of the patent is determined, the patent owner must prove that the accused infringer made, used, sold or imported something covered by the patent.

The accused infringer has a number of ways to defend against the patent infringement lawsuit brought by the patent owner, including challenging the validity of the patent, arguing that whatever the accused infringer is doing does not constitute infringement and even claiming that the patent was obtained through fraud. All these determinations involve complex analysis of the relevant law and facts in a specific case.

A patent owner who wins a patent infringement lawsuit can recover monetary damages from the infringer calculated as either a "reasonable royalty" (the amount the patent owner would have earned had there been a licensing agreement providing for payment of royalties), or lost profits caused by the infringement. If the infringement is found to be “willful”, the Court may triple the amount of damages awarded to the patent owner.

 

TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT

Trademark infringement occurs when the accused infringer uses the same or confusingly similar mark for its own goods or services. Trademark owner can sue the accused infringer for trademark infringement and, if successful, obtain a Court Order stopping the use of the infringing mark, as well as recover monetary damages from the infringer.

To succeed in a trademark infringement lawsuit, the trademark owner must prove that the accused infringer’s activities create likelihood of confusion on the part of the consumers as to the origin of the goods and services covered by the trademark.